What you Need to Know About the Ruling on Campaign Finance Law
It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. It is certain that about 90% of Americans want the role of money in politics to be checked. It is for this reason that a good number of people have been patiently waiting for this ruling to see if corporates will be given the room to donate in future. The decision by the Supreme Court will certainly not be welcome for all. They chose not to consider removing the ban on campaign finance. As you read more, you will learn more about this decision made by the courts.
You need to understand that nothing really happened in court. The Supreme Court simply chose to not to consider the challenges to the current campaign finance laws. This means that corporates will not be allowed to donate any money to both campaigns and candidates. It is through this decision that the role of corporates in the political arena is being tamed. In the previous ruling, you will learn that corporates were often allowed to contribute to the campaigns. This would often be allowed if the money is not tied to a particular individual. You will witness that this case was actually brought about by two companies that come from Massachusetts. This case was purposed to enhance financial responsibility and even economic opportunities. It will actually be valuable for you to go for the services of a top lawyer in the event that you want to present such a big case.
It is also important for you to understand the legal argument behind this particular case. You will note that these companies intimated that the first amendment rights of companies was being overlooked. The argument was based on the fact that political donations were components of freedom of speech. They also appealed to the constitution which indicates the need to equally protect each individual. While at it, non-profit and even charity organizations are not allowed to donate to these campaigns. This means that they are treated differently from corporate entities. This certainly goes against what the dictates of the constitution are.
It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling indicated that corporates are not given the room to contribute to political campaigns. This is because it could easily lead to corruption in politics. As such, no political candidate will be allowed to receive any political donation from corporations.